From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SightSound Techs., LLC v. Apple, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1292 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-1292

11-06-2012

SIGHTSOUND TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.


AMBROSE, Senior District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER OF COURT

On October 29, 2012, the E-Discovery Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation addressing discovery disputes between Sightsound and Apple as discussed during a telephonic hearing on October 19, 2012. (Docket No. 123). Therein, the Special Master made a series of recommendations regarding document production issues. Id. The parties were permitted three business days to object. (Docket No. 54). Neither party filed an Objection. After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Special Master, I find that the R&R should be adopted.

THEREFORE, this 6th day of November, 2012, it is ordered that the Report and Recommendation of the Special Master set forth at Docket No. 123 is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

Donetta W. Ambrose

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

SightSound Techs., LLC v. Apple, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1292 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2012)
Case details for

SightSound Techs., LLC v. Apple, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SIGHTSOUND TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 6, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-1292 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2012)