From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sierra v. Desert Palace, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-cv-00230-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-cv-00230-GMN-CWH

03-14-2013

CARLOS MANUEL SIERRA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DESERT PALACE, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT &

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE

JUDGE C. W. HOFFMAN, JR.


(ECF No. 15 - Plaintiffs' Countermotion for Leave to Amend Complaint)

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 39) of the Honorable C. W. Hoffman, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, entered February 27, 2013. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the pleadings on file herein, and hereby determines that Magistrate Judge Hoffman's Recommendation with regard to ECF No. 15 should be ACCEPTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' claims for the tort of forcible entry and the intentional tort of trespass are DISMISSED with prejudice for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 39) of the Honorable C. W. Hoffman, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, entered February 27, 2013.

____________________

Gloria M. Navarro

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sierra v. Desert Palace, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-cv-00230-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Sierra v. Desert Palace, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS MANUEL SIERRA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DESERT PALACE, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-cv-00230-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2013)