From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siegel v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Apr 22, 1942
191 Misc. 910 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1942)

Opinion

April 22, 1942.

Lawrence S. Timen for plaintiffs.

Tanner, Sillcocks Friend ( Townley, Updike Carter of counsel), for defendants.



Motion granted. The court agrees with the defendant that error was committed on the taxation of costs when the clerk refused to allow as a disbursement the amount paid for stenographer's fees on the examination before trial. Although part of the testimony taken does not affect this issue but is directly concerned with another pending action between these parties, yet in view of the stipulation had herein the costs of the examination of plaintiffs is deemed a proper charge against this litigation.

It is an accepted principle of law originating beyond the memory of living man that when an attorney attests a disbursement as having been made and it comes within legally taxable disbursements, he must be remunerated. An examination of subdivision 10 of section 1518 of the Civil Practice Act, reveals power in the court to allow "necessary expenses as are taxable according to the course and practice of the court or by express provision of law."

That stenographers' fees are a necessary and recognized expense in an examination before trial is a well-settled proposition since Harris v. Rogers ( 106 Misc. 638).

Settle order providing for the retaxation of costs by adding the sum of $555 to the amount already allowed.


Summaries of

Siegel v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Apr 22, 1942
191 Misc. 910 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1942)
Case details for

Siegel v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS H. SIEGEL et al., Doing Business under the Name of POLICYHOLDERS…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Apr 22, 1942

Citations

191 Misc. 910 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1942)
78 N.Y.S.2d 65

Citing Cases

Readex Microprint Corp. v. General Aniline F. Corp.

In Harris v. Rogers ( 106 Misc. 638 [Monroe Co. 1919]) stenographers' fees were held "taxable according to…