From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siebert v. 60 Sutton Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1984
99 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

March 1, 1984


Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered January 6, 1983, granting plaintiff's motion to strike defendants' answers unless defendants comply with a prior order of discovery is unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to impose a further condition that each defendant pay to plaintiff the sum of $500 costs within 20 days after entry of the order herein and otherwise affirmed, without costs of the appeal. In the event that defendants shall fail to comply with the additional condition, the order appealed from is reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the motion to strike the answers is granted. ¶ We are satisfied that the failure to comply with the prior order of discovery was not deliberate. Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for Special Term to grant defendants additional time to make discovery. However, by their failure to respond to the prior order defendants have caused substantial delay. In these circumstances we deem the imposition of sanctions appropriate.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sandler, Sullivan, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.


Summaries of

Siebert v. 60 Sutton Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1984
99 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Siebert v. 60 Sutton Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MURIEL SIEBERT, Appellant, v. 60 SUTTON CORP. et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Wolfson v. Calamel

Order unanimously modified as an exercise of discretion, and as modified affirmed without costs, in…

Salrex Investment, Inc. v. M. Slavin & Sons, Ltd.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.). The IAS court did not abuse its…