From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sidney v. Palanco

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2010
10 Civ. 190 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2010)

Opinion

10 Civ. 190 (JSR).

June 2, 2010


ORDER


On May 17, 2010, the Honorable Theodore H. Katz, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report") in the above-captioned matter recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to timely effect service of process and failure to keep the Court apprised of his mailing address.

Neither of the parties has filed any objection to the Report, and, for that reason alone, the parties have waived any right to further appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985); Mario v. P C Food Markets, Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002); Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report, and, for the reasons stated therein, dismisses the complaint without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sidney v. Palanco

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2010
10 Civ. 190 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Sidney v. Palanco

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY RAYKEM SIDNEY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MAXIMO PALANCO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 2, 2010

Citations

10 Civ. 190 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2010)