From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sicklick v. DirecTV Welfare Benefit Plan

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 27, 2015
2:14-cv-01383-FMO-AGR (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)

Opinion


FAITH SICKLICK Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTV WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, et al. Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-01383-FMO-AGR United States District Court, Central District of California January 27, 2015

          ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

          Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge

         Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 41 days from the filing date of this Order, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sicklick v. DirecTV Welfare Benefit Plan

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 27, 2015
2:14-cv-01383-FMO-AGR (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Sicklick v. DirecTV Welfare Benefit Plan

Case Details

Full title:FAITH SICKLICK Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTV WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 27, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-01383-FMO-AGR (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)