From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siarto v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 8, 1948
171 F.2d 293 (6th Cir. 1948)

Opinion

No. 10627.

December 8, 1948.

Petition to Review a Decision of the Tax Court.

Edgar W. Pugh and George L. Cassidy, both of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

Theron L. Caudle, Charles Oliphant, Sewall Key, Bernard D. Daniels, George A. Stinson, Ellis N. Slack, and Irving I. Acelral, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.


This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel. And no reversible error appearing in the record: It is ordered that the decision of the Tax Court be, and it hereby is affirmed for the reasons given and the grounds stated in the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court.


Summaries of

Siarto v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 8, 1948
171 F.2d 293 (6th Cir. 1948)
Case details for

Siarto v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Andrew SIARTO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 1948

Citations

171 F.2d 293 (6th Cir. 1948)

Citing Cases

Klein v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Hiram C. Wilson, 17 B.T.A. 976; Western Construction Co., 14 T.C. 453, 471. There is, however, an exception…

Harding v. United States, (1953)

We are of the opinion plaintiff is entitled to recover. See Pierce v. Commissioner, 18 B.T.A. 447; Siarto v.…