From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shupe v. Corrections Corporation of America

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 21, 2008
NO. CIV-08-224-HE (W.D. Okla. Oct. 21, 2008)

Summary

granting plaintiff's motion to dismiss claims against unserved defendants

Summary of this case from Sanchez v. King

Opinion

NO. CIV-08-224-HE.

October 21, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff Gerald David Shupe, Jr., a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, instituted this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 asserting violations of his constitutional rights. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred for initial proceedings to Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch. She has recommended that the court grant the plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants Galindo and Smith, who have not been served, and defendant North Fork Correctional Facility's motion to dismiss. She also recommends that the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Corrections Corporation of America, Figueroa and Crouse ("CCA defendants") be treated as a motion for summary judgment and that all claims against those defendants be dismissed based on the plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.

The magistrate judge construed the CCA defendants' motion as one for summary judgment with respect to their affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies because they attached materials outside the pleadings to support it.

The parties failed to object to the Report and Recommendation and thus waived their right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. United States v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059-60 (10th Cir. 1996); see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); LCvR72.1.

Accordingly, the court adopts Magistrate Judge Couch's Report and Recommendation. The plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants Galindo and Smith and defendant North Fork Correctional Facility's motion to dismiss are granted. The motion to dismiss filed by defendants Corrections Corporation of America, Figueroa and Crouse is treated as a motion for summary judgment with respect to their exhaustion defense and is granted. All claims against those defendants are dismissed based on the plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shupe v. Corrections Corporation of America

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 21, 2008
NO. CIV-08-224-HE (W.D. Okla. Oct. 21, 2008)

granting plaintiff's motion to dismiss claims against unserved defendants

Summary of this case from Sanchez v. King
Case details for

Shupe v. Corrections Corporation of America

Case Details

Full title:GERALD DAVID SHUPE, JR., Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 21, 2008

Citations

NO. CIV-08-224-HE (W.D. Okla. Oct. 21, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. King

Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion to dismiss his claims against…