From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shull v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 23, 1986
481 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. BE-307.

January 23, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Bay County, N. Russell Bower, J.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender; and Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Gregory G. Costas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


We find no error in the trial judge considering habitual offender status as a reason for departure under the guidelines. Payne v. State, 480 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (on motion for rehearing). However, we remand to the trial judge to provide written reasons in compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11), even though the trial judge made written findings in the order of sentencing as a habitual felony offender. Cuthbert v. State, 459 So.2d 1098, 1100, n. 3 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); see also State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985).

ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., and McCORD, GUYTE P., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Shull v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 23, 1986
481 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Shull v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN GARLAND SHULL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 23, 1986

Citations

481 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Webster v. State

The second reason for departure is not clear and convincing. Oral statements made by the judge at sentencing…

Vicknair v. State

We recognize that Ferguson v. State, 481 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), and Fleming v. State, 480 So.2d 715…