From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shukla v. Apple Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 17, 2021
21-CV-3287 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-3287 (JMF)

12-17-2021

ASHU SHUKLA, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 8, 2021, Plaintiff Ashu Shukla filed a letter responding to Defendant Deloitte's reply memorandum of law in support of its motion to dismiss. See ECF No. 102. Plaintiff did not seek, and the Court did not grant, leave to file a sur-reply or otherwise respond to Deloitte's reply. Thus, Plaintiffs submission is procedurally improper and will be disregarded. Defendants' motions to dismiss are now fully submitted.

Separately, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing by December 10, 2021, why his claims in this case should not be dismissed and a litigation bar imposed. See ECF No. 91, at 8. He did not file a response by that date. Having failed to meet the deadline, he may not do so now.

In light of the foregoing, all future filings will be disregarded unless, prior to making the filing, the filing party seeks and obtains leave of the Court to make a filing.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shukla v. Apple Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 17, 2021
21-CV-3287 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Shukla v. Apple Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ASHU SHUKLA, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 17, 2021

Citations

21-CV-3287 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2021)