From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shufelt v. Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 19, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-1014 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-1014 WBS CKD P

12-19-2018

GEORGE W. SHUFELT, Plaintiff, v. RAFAEL MIRANDA, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed October 23, 2018, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// ///// waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: December 19, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
shuf1014.fta


Summaries of

Shufelt v. Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 19, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-1014 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Shufelt v. Miranda

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE W. SHUFELT, Plaintiff, v. RAFAEL MIRANDA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 19, 2018

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-1014 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2018)