From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shrum v. Riker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jun 7, 2012
Civil No. 3:11-0938 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:11-0938

06-07-2012

JAMES SHRUM and JOSH MALCOLM, Plaintiff, v. ADRIEL RIKER and SONYA TROUTT, Defendants.


Judge Trauger

Magistrate Judge Brown


ORDER

On May 10, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a report and Recommendation (Docket No. 56), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that all claims asserted by plaintiff Josh Malcolm in this case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

It is so ORDERED.

___________

ALETA A. TRAUGER

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Shrum v. Riker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jun 7, 2012
Civil No. 3:11-0938 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Shrum v. Riker

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SHRUM and JOSH MALCOLM, Plaintiff, v. ADRIEL RIKER and SONYA TROUTT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 3:11-0938 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 7, 2012)