From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shropshire v. Sulzbacher

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 8, 2014
CASE NO.: SC14-968 (Fla. Sep. 8, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC14-968

09-08-2014

JALEN SHROPSHIRE Petitioner(s) v. SUSAN SULZBACHER, ET AL. Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 1D13-6107; 16-2010-CA-13226

Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
/s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
sh
Served:
MATTHEW F. HAVICE
JALEN SHROPSHIRE
HON. RONNIE FUSSELL, CLERK
HON. JON S. WHEELER, CLERK
HON. JACK MARVIN SCHEMER, JUDGE


Summaries of

Shropshire v. Sulzbacher

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 8, 2014
CASE NO.: SC14-968 (Fla. Sep. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Shropshire v. Sulzbacher

Case Details

Full title:JALEN SHROPSHIRE Petitioner(s) v. SUSAN SULZBACHER, ET AL. Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 8, 2014

Citations

CASE NO.: SC14-968 (Fla. Sep. 8, 2014)