From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shropshire v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 13, 2021
320 So. 3d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-2457

05-13-2021

Jalen SHROPSHIRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jalen Shropshire, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Jalen Shropshire, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant seeks review of the lower tribunal clerk's refusal to accept a pro se motion to correct illegal sentence that Appellant had attempted to file after having been barred from further pro se filings below. The Court notes Appellant's response docketed February 25, 2021. This cause is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Appellant does not seek review of any signed, written lower tribunal order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b).

Kelsey, Jay, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shropshire v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 13, 2021
320 So. 3d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Shropshire v. State

Case Details

Full title:JALEN SHROPSHIRE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 13, 2021

Citations

320 So. 3d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)