From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shorty v. Sparkman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DISTRICT
Sep 4, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-114(DCB)(MTP) (S.D. Miss. Sep. 4, 2013)

Summary

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from McNeil v. Quality Logistics Sys., Inc.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-114(DCB)(MTP)

09-04-2013

EDDIE JAMES SHORTY PLAINTIFF v. EMMITT L SPARKMAN, LARRY LEE, AND RAYMOND BYRD DEFENDANTS


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (docket entry 48) of Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker, as well as defendant Raymond Byrd's motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process (docket entry 40), plaintiff's motion for a default judgment (docket entry 37), and plaintiff's motion for an order directing defendants to answer (docket entry 43) . Having considered same, and there being no objections from plaintiff or defendants to the Report and Recommendation, the Court orders as follows:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry 48) of Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court;

FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Raymond Byrd's Motion to Dismiss for insufficient service of process (docket entry 40) is DENIED without prejudice;

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a default judgment (docket entry 37) and motion for an order directing defendants to answer (docket entry 43) are DENIED;

FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff is afforded an additional thirty days from the date of entry of this Order to complete service of process and to file appropriate proof thereof with the Clerk of Court. The plaintiff is further advised that failure to properly complete service of process or to file the proof of service within the thirty days will result in a dismissal of all unserved defendants without prejudice and without further notice.

David Bramlette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Shorty v. Sparkman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DISTRICT
Sep 4, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-114(DCB)(MTP) (S.D. Miss. Sep. 4, 2013)

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from McNeil v. Quality Logistics Sys., Inc.
Case details for

Shorty v. Sparkman

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE JAMES SHORTY PLAINTIFF v. EMMITT L SPARKMAN, LARRY LEE, AND RAYMOND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 4, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-114(DCB)(MTP) (S.D. Miss. Sep. 4, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Tegeder

Cases from the Mississippi Supreme Court and federal courts in Mississippi make clear that Mississippi law…

Tootle v. Dawson

"However, under Mississippi law, service by certified mail is not permitted upon an in-state defendant" such…