From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shortau v. Buresch

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Apr 25, 1949
3 N.J. Super. 139 (App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

Argued April 18, 1949 —

Decided April 25, 1949.

Appeal from Passaic District Court

Before Judges McGEEHAN, DONGES and COLIE.

Mr. Louis Wallisch, Jr. ( Messrs. Wallisch Wallisch, attorneys) argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Jack Rinzler ( Messrs. Feder Rinzler, attorneys) argued the cause for the respondent.


This is the defendant's appeal from a judgment for $150 rendered against him in the Passaic District Court prior to September 15, 1948. The appendix contains the state of demand, notice of appeal, an order allowing deposit in lieu of appeal bond and the comments of the trial court at the conclusion of the case and nothing more. The questions sought to be raised are failure to nonsuit and direct a verdict for defendant and alleged errors in the admission of evidence. Rule 1:3-2(f) requires appellant to furnish an appendix which "shall contain such parts of the record material to the questions presented as the appellant desires the court to read." The appendix fails to meet the requirement of the rule.

On the court's motion without oral argument on the merits, the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Shortau v. Buresch

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Apr 25, 1949
3 N.J. Super. 139 (App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Shortau v. Buresch

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN SHORTAU, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRED BURESCH…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Apr 25, 1949

Citations

3 N.J. Super. 139 (App. Div. 1949)
65 A.2d 634

Citing Cases

State v. Wilkerson

No appendix has been submitted to us in the least informative of the factual structure upon which the…

State Highway Commissioner v. Union Paving Co.

The trial court's findings refer to evidence which it has reviewed and in absence of preponderating proofs in…