From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoemaker v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 11, 2016
Civil No. 1:14-cv-2049 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2016)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:14-cv-2049

01-11-2016

MARY S. SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant


Magistrate Judge Cohn

MEMORANDUM

Before the court is a report and recommendation filed by the magistrate judge in which he recommends that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff benefits under the Act be vacated and the case remanded to the Commissioner to develop the record fully, conduct a new administrative hearing, and appropriately evaluate the evidence. (Doc. 22.)

The defendant waived the opportunity to object to the report and recommendation. (Doc. 23.)

Upon a thorough review of the report and recommendation, the court will adopt the same.

s/Sylvia H. Rambo

SYLVIA H. RAMBO

United States District Judge Dated: January 11, 2016


Summaries of

Shoemaker v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 11, 2016
Civil No. 1:14-cv-2049 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Shoemaker v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:MARY S. SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 11, 2016

Citations

Civil No. 1:14-cv-2049 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2016)

Citing Cases

Palmer v. Colvin

(Pl. Reply at 15). Cf. Shoemaker v. Colvin, No. 114CV02049SHRGBC, 2015 WL 9690310, at *14 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 18,…

McDonnell v. Colvin

Plaintiff did not raise this issue, but the Third Circuit requires the ALJ to explicitly address third-party…