From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoemake v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 30, 1915
165 P. 632 (Okla. Crim. App. 1915)

Summary

In Sheehan v. Kasper, 41 Nev. 27, 165 P. 632, involving water rights, the court held that an executed parol license, though without consideration, is irrevocable, following its earlier decision in Lee v. McLeod, 12 Nev. 280, also involving water rights and dams.

Summary of this case from Clausen v. Armington

Opinion

No. A-2360.

Opinion Filed October 30, 1915. Rehearing Denied September 25, 1917.

Appeal from Superior Court, Muskogee County; H.C. Thurman, Judge.

Boney Shoemake was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and appeals. Affirmed.

S.M. Rutherford, for plaintiff in error.

Chas. West, Atty. Gen., and C.J. Davenport, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error was convicted on an information charging the unlawful conveyance of 24 quarts of whisky from a point unknown in Muskogee county to a point about 30 feet northeast of the Midland Valley depot in the town of Porum. September 23, 1914, the court rendered judgment and sentenced him to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50 and the costs. The evidence for the state tends to show that plaintiff in error left a train arriving at Porum from Ft. Smith with two grips containing whisky, and, when arrested, said "he had gotten the liquor for sick folks." As a witness in his own behalf, the defendant testified that when he got off the train he did not have any grips; that after walking eight or ten steps Deputy Sheriff McClelland "hollered" at him and said. "I will take those grips and you, too, to Muskogee," and witness answered, "What grips?" that he looked and saw two grips on the ground eight or ten steps from him.

Upon a careful examination of the record in this case, we are satisfied that none of the alleged errors are well taken. It was for the jury to determine to what extent they would give credit to the defendant's testimony.

Finding no errors prejudicial to the defendant, the judgment will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Shoemake v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 30, 1915
165 P. 632 (Okla. Crim. App. 1915)

In Sheehan v. Kasper, 41 Nev. 27, 165 P. 632, involving water rights, the court held that an executed parol license, though without consideration, is irrevocable, following its earlier decision in Lee v. McLeod, 12 Nev. 280, also involving water rights and dams.

Summary of this case from Clausen v. Armington
Case details for

Shoemake v. State

Case Details

Full title:BONEY SHOEMAKE v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 30, 1915

Citations

165 P. 632 (Okla. Crim. App. 1915)
165 P. 632
12 Okla. Crim. 599

Citing Cases

Masini v. Fraser

Masini concedes that the Frasers have an independent secondary easement along the bank of the irrigation…

Clausen v. Armington

In the case at bar plaintiff was not a trespasser when he went to the ditch located on his own land and at…