Opinion
No. 51965.
October 18, 1966.
HABEAS CORPUS: Plaintiff who is no longer deprived of liberty 1 not entitled to writ. Where plaintiff in habeas corpus seeking release from jail while being held under extradition proceedings had been returned to California, has since been released from prison there, and is in no way currently deprived of his liberty, the question of his restraint is moot and his appeal is dismissed.
HABEAS CORPUS: Remedy for person illegally restrained. Habeas 2 corpus is a summary remedy available to a person who is illegally restrained.
Appeal from Des Moines District Court — GEORGE O. VAN ALLEN, Judge.
Appeal from decision of trial court annulling Writ of Habeas Corpus dismissed as moot since petitioner is no longer under restraint. — Appeal dismissed.
Joseph L. Phelan, of Fort Madison, for appellant.
William Hildreth, County Attorney, and Paul Kinion, Assistant County Attorney, of Burlington, for appellee.
[1, 2] Plaintiff instituted this action for a writ of habeas corpus to secure his release from the Des Moines County jail. Plaintiff's counsel acknowledged in oral argument on appeal that after trial plaintiff had been returned to California under extradition proceedings as a parole violator and had since been released and discharged from prison, was sitting in the Supreme Court Chamber and was in no way currently deprived of his liberty. Habeas corpus is a summary remedy available to a person who is illegally restrained. Code of Iowa, section 663.1. Since plaintiff is no longer restrained, the question is moot and the appeal is dismissed at plaintiff's costs. Ex parte Bell, 328 Mich. 185, 43 N.W.2d 321; 39 C.J.S. 730, 731, Habeas Corpus, section 118. — Appeal dismissed.
All JUSTICES concur except THORNTON, J., who takes no part.