From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shiny Rock Mining v. Ace Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 22, 2005
114 P.3d 538 (Or. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

00C-12656; A120827.

Argued and submitted May 26, 2005.

Affirmed June 22, 2005.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Jamese Rhoades, Judge.

Harlan E. Jones argued the cause for appellant. With him on the opening brief were Christopher L. Reive, Linda L. Waugh, and Jordan Schrader PC. With him on the reply brief was Jordan Schrader PC.

Steven P. Soha argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were Christine E. Dinsdale and Soha Lang, P.S.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Ortega, Judge, and Deits, Judge pro tempore.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


In this action seeking insurance reimbursement for environmental remediation costs, plaintiff raises two assignments of error in its challenge of summary judgment for defendant insurer. We reject plaintiff's first assignment of error without discussion. Plaintiff's second assignment of error is resolved by Schnitzer Investment Corp. v. Certain Underwriters, 197 Or App 147, 104 P3d 1162 (2005).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Shiny Rock Mining v. Ace Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 22, 2005
114 P.3d 538 (Or. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Shiny Rock Mining v. Ace Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SHINY ROCK MINING COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Appellant, v. ACE…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 22, 2005

Citations

114 P.3d 538 (Or. Ct. App. 2005)
114 P.3d 538

Citing Cases

Shiny Rock Mining v. Ace Prop

September 26, 2006. Appeal from the 200 Or App 393. Petitions for Review…