From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shingleton v. Timmerman-Cooper

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 8, 2006
Case No. 3:03cv450 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:03cv450.

March 8, 2006


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #21); PETITIONER'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER (DOC. #20) SUSTAINED; JUDGMENT (DOC. #18) VACATED; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. #19) RECOMMITTED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION; CASE REACTIVATED


Based upon reasoning and citations of authority set forth by the United States Magistrate Judge in her Report and Recommendations dated April 12, 2005 (Doc. #21), as well as upon a thorough consideration of the applicable law and a de novo review of this Court's file, said Report and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety. The Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider (Doc. #20) is sustained, and the Petitioner's Objections (Doc. #19) to said judicial filing are recommitted to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington for further consideration. This Court's Judgment Entry (Doc. #18) is vacated, and the captioned cause reactivated upon the docket records of this Court.


Summaries of

Shingleton v. Timmerman-Cooper

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 8, 2006
Case No. 3:03cv450 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Shingleton v. Timmerman-Cooper

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE R. SHINGLETON, Petitioner, v. DEBORAH TIMMERMAN-COOPER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 8, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:03cv450 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2006)