From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shifer v. Kelmendi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1998
248 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant's contention that the subject loan is criminally usurious has already been considered and rejected by prior decision and order of this Court dated May 2, 1994 (see, Shifer v. Kelmendi, 204 A.D.2d 300; cf., People v. Williams, 188 A.D.2d 573).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

Thompson, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shifer v. Kelmendi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1998
248 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Shifer v. Kelmendi

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SHIFER, Respondent, v. AGIM KELMENDI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 2, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 851