From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shick v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 26, 2017
175 A.3d 979 (Pa. 2017)

Opinion

No. 33 WAP 2017

09-26-2017

Russell Scott SHICK, Appellant v. Michael R. CLARK, Superintendent, Individually and Collaterally, Melinda L. Adams, Deputy Superintendent, Individually and Collaterally, Carl Franz, Deputy Superintendent, Individually and Collaterally, Michelle Tharp, Grievance Coordinator, Individually and Collaterally, Roni Martucci, Former Grievance Coordinator, Individually and Collaterally, Diane Woodside, Director of Policy and Legislation, Individually and Collaterally, Christine Zirkle, Former CHCA, Individually and Collaterally, Michael Edwards, CHCA, Individually and Collaterally, Valerie Kusiak, Former CHCA, Individually and Collaterally, Lisa Linder, R.N.S., Individually and Collaterally, Appellees


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of September, 2017, the Notice of Appeal is quashed, and the Application for Relief and the Application for Leave to Supplement Filing are denied.


Summaries of

Shick v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 26, 2017
175 A.3d 979 (Pa. 2017)
Case details for

Shick v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:Russell Scott SHICK, Appellant v. Michael R. CLARK, Superintendent…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Sep 26, 2017

Citations

175 A.3d 979 (Pa. 2017)