Opinion
No. ED 110426
02-28-2023
Gary SHERRILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
FOR APPELLANT: Kathryn M. Merwald, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 920 West Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, Missouri 64105. FOR RESPONDENT: Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
FOR APPELLANT: Kathryn M. Merwald, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 920 West Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, Missouri 64105.
FOR RESPONDENT: Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Kelly C. Broniec, P.J., Philip M. Hess, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Gary Sherrill ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing finding Movant failed to establish his trial counsel was ineffective. Movant brings two points on appeal, each alleging the motion court clearly erred in denying his ineffective assistance of counsel claims. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court did not clearly err as alleged by Movant.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court under Rule 84.16(b).