From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherrill v. Shuford

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 1, 1849
41 N.C. 228 (N.C. 1849)

Opinion

(August Term, 1849.)

A trustee is entitled to commissions as compensation for his labor in managing the trust committed to him, though no provision be made for it in the deed of trust.

THIS case came before the Court upon exceptions to the report of the clerk to whom it had been referred at the last term. It is necessary to state only the ninth exception, as the others related entirely to matters of fact. The ninth exception was that the clerk had allowed 2 1/2 per cent as commissions to the trustee when there was no provision in the deed of trust that the trustee should receive any compensation for his services.

Boyd and Guion for plaintiff.

Alexander, Craige, and Iredell for defendant.


The ninth exception is overruled, because we think a trustee is entitled to commissions as compensation for his labor in managing the trust committed to him, though no provision be made for it in the deed.

PER CURIAM. This exception overruled.

Cited: Cannon v. McCape, 114 N.C. 582; Ivie v. Blum, 159 N.C. 123.

(229)


Summaries of

Sherrill v. Shuford

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 1, 1849
41 N.C. 228 (N.C. 1849)
Case details for

Sherrill v. Shuford

Case Details

Full title:ABSALOM SHERRILL v. ANDREW H. SHUFORD

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Aug 1, 1849

Citations

41 N.C. 228 (N.C. 1849)

Citing Cases

Ivie v. Blum

It is equally well settled that the creditors in the indebtedness incurred by Shelton in continuing the…

Cannon v. McCape

In this state, as early as 1799, an act was passed providing compensation for executors, guardians and the…