From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 22, 1984
451 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-2524.

June 22, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; J. Rogers Padgett, Judge.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Douglas S. Connor, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal in this case, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and, therefore, the order withholding adjudication of guilt and placing appellant on probation appealed from is affirmed. At sentencing in open court the court orally pronounced a term of probation for a period of two years. However, the written order provides for a three-year period of probation. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court for correction of the apparent clerical error in the order of probation. Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla.2d DCA 1983).

The order is AFFIRMED in all other respects.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Sherman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 22, 1984
451 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Sherman v. State

Case Details

Full title:CORNELIUS SHERMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 22, 1984

Citations

451 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)