From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shepard v. Podsakoff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 8, 2015
1:12-cv-00495-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2015)

Opinion

1:12-cv-00495-AWI-GSA-PC

08-08-2015

LAMONT SHEPARD, Plaintiff, v. M. PODSAKOFF, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 25.)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REVOKE PLAINTIFF'S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS
(Doc. 18.)
ORDER VACATING ORDER ISSUED ON JANUARY 28, 2014
(Doc. 4.)
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY $350.00 FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN THIRTY DAYS ORDER FOR CLERK TO SERVE THIS ORDER ON COURT FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT AND DIRECTOR OF CDCR

At the time Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action, the fee to file a civil rights action was $350.00. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). According to court financial records, no payments have been made for the filing fee for this action to date. --------

Lamont Shepard ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 22, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that Defendant Podsakoff's motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) be granted. Doc. 25. The parties were granted thirty days in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. Id. To date, no objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 22, 2015, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. Defendant Podsakoff's motion to revoke Plaintiff's IFP status under section 1915(g), filed on December 9, 2014, is GRANTED;

3. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is REVOKED;

4. The court's order issued on April 3, 2012, which granted Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, is VACATED;

5. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is required to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full for this action;

6. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action; and

7. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff and on:

(1) the Financial Department, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division; and

(2) the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, via the court's electronic case filing system (CM/ECF).
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 8, 2015

/s/_________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Shepard v. Podsakoff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 8, 2015
1:12-cv-00495-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Shepard v. Podsakoff

Case Details

Full title:LAMONT SHEPARD, Plaintiff, v. M. PODSAKOFF, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 8, 2015

Citations

1:12-cv-00495-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2015)