From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shepard v. Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00023-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00023-BAM PC

02-21-2013

LAMONT SHEPARD, Plaintiff, v. R. PEREZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS

FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

WITHOUT PREJUDICE


(ECF Nos. 69, 74)

Plaintiff Lamont Shepard ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's complaint Defendants L.A. Martinez, R. Perez, P. Garcia, J. Soto, E. De la Cruz and A Trevino for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. A telephonic trial confirmation hearing is set for March 15, 2013, and a jury trial is set for May 6, 2013.

On November 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference. (ECF No. 69.) Defendants did not respond. On January 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a second motion requesting a settlement conference. (ECF No. 74.) On January 30, 2013, the Court ordered Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's motions and notify the Court whether they believed, in good faith, that settlement in this case was a possibility and whether they were interested in having a settlement conference scheduled by the Court.

On February 13, 2013, Defendants filed a response stating that they were willing to make a meaningful attempt to resolve this case, but did not believe that a settlement was possible because of Plaintiff's expectations about the worth of his case. (ECF No. 80.) Defendants also indicated that Plaintiff owes more than $5,000 in restitution, but they are unlikely to offer to settle this case for more than $5,000, which makes settlement highly unlikely.

The Court declines to schedule a settlement conference at this time. No settlement conference will be scheduled until such time as both parties agree that settlement in the action is possible. Should both parties be willing to participate in a settlement conference in a good faith effort to settle this action, they may file a joint request for a settlement conference. Plaintiff's motions for a settlement conference are HEREBY DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Shepard v. Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00023-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Shepard v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:LAMONT SHEPARD, Plaintiff, v. R. PEREZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00023-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)