Opinion
2:23-cv-00631-KKE
03-18-2024
SHENZHEN ROOT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHIARO TECHNOLOGY LTD., Defendant. CHIARO TECHNOLOGY LTD., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. SHENZHEN ROOT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., et al., Counterclaim Defendants.
Lowe G Raham Jones PLLC Mark P. Walters, Mitchell D. West, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC Nirav N. Desai (pro hac vice) Josephine Kim (pro hac vice) Joseph Kim (pro hac vice) Alex Alfano (pro hac vice) Alexander Covington (pro hac vice) Paige Cloud (pro hac vice) Michael Webb (pro hac vice) Zachary L. Jacobs (pro hac vice) Richa Patel (pro hac vice) Christopher Coleman (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Chiaro Technology Ltd. Arete Law Group PLLC Jeremy E. Roller, SHM Law Firm Qianwu Yang (pro hac vice) Xiaomin Cao (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Shenzhen Root Technology Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Limited, and Shenzhen Conglin E-Commerce Co., Ltd
Lowe G Raham Jones PLLC Mark P. Walters, Mitchell D. West,
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC Nirav N. Desai (pro hac vice) Josephine Kim (pro hac vice) Joseph Kim (pro hac vice) Alex Alfano (pro hac vice) Alexander Covington (pro hac vice) Paige Cloud (pro hac vice) Michael Webb (pro hac vice) Zachary L. Jacobs (pro hac vice) Richa Patel (pro hac vice) Christopher Coleman (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Chiaro Technology Ltd.
Arete Law Group PLLC Jeremy E. Roller, SHM Law Firm Qianwu Yang (pro hac vice) Xiaomin Cao (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Shenzhen Root Technology Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Limited, and Shenzhen Conglin E-Commerce Co., Ltd
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR MOMCOZY TO RESPOND TO ELVIE'S MOTION TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIMS
Kymberly K. Evanson, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants (“Momcozy”) and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Chiaro Technology Ltd. (“Elvie”) stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On March 1, 2024, Elvie filed a Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaims. (“the Motion”). Dkt. No. 101. The Motion is noted for March 22, 2024.
2. Elvie has agreed to Momcozy's request to extend the deadline to file its Response to the Motion from March 18, 2024, to March 20, 2024.
3. The Motion shall remain noted for March 22, 2024, and the deadline for Elvie to file its Reply in Support of the Motion shall remain March 22, 2024.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. The deadline for Momcozy to file its Response to the Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 101) is extended to March 20, 2024. The Motion shall remain noted for March 22, 2024, and Elvie's Reply in Support of the Motion shall remain due March 22, 2024.