Opinion
No. 7417DC666
Filed 18 September 1974
Appeal and Error 26 — assignment of error to signing and entry of judgment Assignment of error to the signing and entry of judgment presents only the face of the record for review.
APPEAL by defendant from Clark, Judge, 1 March 1974 Session of District Court held in SURRY County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 28 August 1974.
Folger Folger by Fred Folger, Jr., for plaintiff appellee.
W. Warren Sparrow for defendant appellant.
This is an appeal from an order allowing plaintiff's motion for alimony pendente lite, custody and support of minor children, and counsel fees. Appellant's sole assignment of error is to the signing and entry of the judgment. Such an assignment of error presents the face of the record for review, and review is limited to the question of whether error of law appears on the face of the record, which includes whether the facts found or admitted, support the conclusions of law and the judgment. But, such an assignment of error does not present for review the findings of fact or the sufficiency of the evidence to support them. 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, 26, p. 152.
Suffice it to say, therefore, we have carefully examined the face of the record and find no error thereon. The findings of fact, which are in considerable detail, support the conclusions of law, which in turn support the order appealed from.
Affirmed.
Judges BRITT and BALEY concur.