Shelton v. Nidec Motors Inc.

Full title: DAVID SHELTON PLAINTIFF v. NIDEC MOTORS INC. DEFENDANT

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:04CV291-WAP-DAS (N.D. Miss. Mar. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:04CV291-WAP-DAS

03-16-2012

DAVID SHELTON PLAINTIFF v. NIDEC MOTORS INC. DEFENDANT

Jane M. Virden

ORDER

BEFORE THE COURT is the plaintiff's motion for the clerk's office to issue subpoenas to three individuals (#27). However, the motion is too vague and lacks necessary information. The clerk's office cannot issue a subpoena with only the witnesses' names provided. If it is the plaintiff's desire to subpoena witnesses for depositions, the date, time and location of the deposition will need to be specified and the current addresses of the deponents will be necessary in order to prepare the subpoenas. Finally, it is the plaintiff's responsibility to have subpoenas that are issued by the court actually served on the witnesses.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, that plaintiff's motion for the issuance of subpoenas is hereby denied.

Jane M. Virden

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE