From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheikh v. Mughal

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 24, 2012
95 So. 3d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 5D12–1140.

2012-08-24

Jimil SHEIKH, Appellant, v. Zulle–Huma MUGHAL, Appellee.

Non Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Matthew Foxman, Judge. Jimil M. Sheikh, Sanford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Non Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Matthew Foxman, Judge.


Jimil M. Sheikh, Sanford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Jamil Sheikh appeals from an order of civil contempt, making numerous arguments based upon matters not included in the record. Without a record, and because there is no error apparent on the face of the order itself, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (holding that a trial court's order is presumed correct and that where appellant does not provide a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court has no basis to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence). See also Poling v. Palm Coast Abstract & Title, Inc., 882 So.2d 483, 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sheikh v. Mughal

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 24, 2012
95 So. 3d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Sheikh v. Mughal

Case Details

Full title:Jimil SHEIKH, Appellant, v. Zulle–Huma MUGHAL, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Aug 24, 2012

Citations

95 So. 3d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)