From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shehee v. King

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 1, 2015
1:14-cv-01412-LJO-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2015)

Opinion


GREGORY ELL SHEHEE, Plaintiff, v. AUDREY KING, et al., Defendants. No. 1:14-cv-01412-LJO-BAM (PC) Appeal No. 15-15843 United States District Court, E.D. California. May 1, 2015

          ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

         By notice entered April 28, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit referred this matter to the District Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of in forma pauperis status is appropriate where the District Court finds the appeal to be frivolous).

         Permitting litigants to proceed in forma pauperis is a privilege, not a right. Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1231 (9th Cir. 1984); Williams v. Field, 394 F.2d 329, 332 (9th Cir., cert. denied, 393 U.S. 891 (1968); Williams v. Marshall, 795 F.Supp. 978, 978-79 (N.D. Cal. 1992). A federal court may dismiss a claim filed in forma pauperis prior to service if it is satisfied that the action is frivolous or malicious. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Sully v. Lungren, 842 F.Supp. 1230, 1231 (N.D. Cal. 1994). If a plaintiff with in forma pauperis status brings a case without arguable substance in law and fact, the court may declare the case frivolous. Franklin, 745 F.2d at 1227. Plaintiff is appealing the Court's dismissal of his complaint following screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff's complaint was an apparent appeal from a state court judgment. Upon screening, the Magistrate Judge found that the Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and recommended dismissal. Following consideration of Plaintiff's objections, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations and dismissed the action. Because Plaintiff's complaint is without arguable substance in law and fact, the case is frivolous and Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The appeal is declared frivolous and not taken in good faith;

2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in Appeal No. 15-15843, filed April 24, 2015;

3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(4), this Order serves as notice to the parties and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of the finding that Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis for this appeal; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shehee v. King

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 1, 2015
1:14-cv-01412-LJO-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Shehee v. King

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY ELL SHEHEE, Plaintiff, v. AUDREY KING, et al., Defendants. Appeal…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 1, 2015

Citations

1:14-cv-01412-LJO-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2015)