From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheffield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 18, 2000
769 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

In Sheffield v. State, 769 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we held that the appellant had failed to preserve the trial court's purported error in failing to conduct a Nelson inquiry.

Summary of this case from Hall v. State

Opinion

Case No. 4D99-2221

Opinion filed October 18, 2000 July Term 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John L. Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-13798CFA02.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rajeev Saxena, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's convictions for possession of cocaine, possession of a concealed weapon, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting arrest with violence.

Prior to trial, appellant filed a handwritten motion to discharge the assistant public defender who was representing him. However, he never called the motion to the court's attention. He never asked for a hearing on the motion. He proceeded to trial with the same public defender, without voicing any objection to the trial court. Under these circumstances, appellant waived his right to have the trial court conduct a hearing under Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256, 259 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). See Kinzie v. State, 696 So.2d 530, 530-31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

On the remaining issues raised, we find no error. See Dorelus v. State, 747 So.2d 368 (Fla. 1999); Ensor v. State, 403 So.2d 349, 353 (Fla. 1981), clarified in Dorelus, 747 So.2d at 371-73;Gordon v. State, 639 So.2d 188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sheffield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 18, 2000
769 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

In Sheffield v. State, 769 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we held that the appellant had failed to preserve the trial court's purported error in failing to conduct a Nelson inquiry.

Summary of this case from Hall v. State

In Sheffield v. State, 769 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we held that the appellant had failed to preserve the trial court's purported error in failing to conduct a Nelson inquiry.

Summary of this case from Hall v. State

In Sheffield, the defendant filed a written motion to discharge his court-appointed counsel but never made any attempt to bring the issue to the trial court's attention.

Summary of this case from Jackson v. State
Case details for

Sheffield v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS SHEFFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 18, 2000

Citations

769 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Tomas v. State

In his second letter, Tomas requested appointment of another attorney. In resolving this issue, we are guided…

Thompson v. State

Thompson clearly had to know that a different judge from Judge Arnold was presiding at trial and did not…