From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheehan v. Jamestown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-cv-2060-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:12-cv-2060-AWI-BAM PC

05-02-2013

RANDALL LEE SHEEHAN, Plaintiff, v. CDCR-JAMESTOWN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT


(ECF No. 16)

Plaintiff Randall Lee Sheehan is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for default judgment against Defendant E. Cervantes. (ECF No. 16.)

Plaintiff is not entitled to entry of default or default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), (b). Service of process has not yet been initiated in this action, and in the absence of Defendant's failure to file a timely response once legal service of process has been completed, Plaintiff has no entitlement to the entry of default or to the entry of default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e). Plaintiff is directed to re-read paragraph 12 of the First Informational Order, which addresses screening and service of process. (ECF No. 8.)

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sheehan v. Jamestown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-cv-2060-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Sheehan v. Jamestown

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL LEE SHEEHAN, Plaintiff, v. CDCR-JAMESTOWN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 1:12-cv-2060-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)