From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shearson v. Yianilos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 1995
220 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 19, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.).


The IAS Court correctly held that neither the Subscription Agreement, to which petitioners were not even parties, nor the Margin Agreement, which merely gave respondents the right to select one of several arbitral tribunals, avail petitioners to show that respondents consented to the jurisdiction of New York courts. Absent such consent, the minimal contacts between respondents and this State necessary to sustain jurisdiction here are clearly lacking ( see, World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 291-294).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Kupferman, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Shearson v. Yianilos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 1995
220 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Shearson v. Yianilos

Case Details

Full title:SMITH BARNEY SHEARSON et al., Appellants, v. JOHN P. YIANILOS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 115