From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shealy v. Moseley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 21, 2018
No. 18-6321 (4th Cir. Aug. 21, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6321

08-21-2018

DONALD STANTON SHEALY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. BONITA MOSELEY, Respondent - Appellee.

Donald Stanton Shealy, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00257-DCN) Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Stanton Shealy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald Stanton Shealy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shealy v. Moseley, No. 1:18-cv-00257-DCN (Mar. 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Shealy v. Moseley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 21, 2018
No. 18-6321 (4th Cir. Aug. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Shealy v. Moseley

Case Details

Full title:DONALD STANTON SHEALY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. BONITA MOSELEY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 21, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6321 (4th Cir. Aug. 21, 2018)

Citing Cases

Shealey v. United States

Petitioner also sought relief under § 2241 in the District of South Carolina, but relief was denied. See,…