From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. Still

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 17, 1972
192 S.E.2d 206 (S.C. 1972)

Opinion

19499

October 17, 1972.

Messrs. Edens, Woodward Butler, of Columbia, for Appellants, cite: As to the guest of a tenant being unable to maintain an action ex delicto against a landlord for his breach of contractual duty to repair: 254 S.C. 44, 173 S.E.2d 343; 173 S.C. 299, 175 S.E. 531; 164 S.C. 361, 162 S.E. 329; 63 Ga. App. 790, 12 S.E.2d 103; 52 C.J.S., Landlord Tenant, Secs. 418 (1), 418 (8) (1968).

Respondent was not represented by counsel.


October 17, 1972.


This action ex delicto was brought by the plaintiff by reason of an alleged fall on a defective step leading to a dwelling house owned by defendants Thomas Lane and Oliver Wolfe, and rented to defendants George and Joyce Still through defendant Swaffield Agency, Inc. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff went to the home of the Stills for the purpose of employing George Still to perform services and fell as she left the house.

The defendants Lane and Wolfe demurred to the complaint on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ex delicto as to them. The lower court overruled the demurrer. The demurring defendants have appealed.

After the transcript of record was filed, the appellants filed their brief. No brief has been submitted on behalf of plaintiff-respondent.

The appellants submit that, "His Honor erred in overruling the demurrer in that the complaint shows upon its face that it sounds in tort, and an action ex delicto will not lie for the breach of a contractual duty to repair."

Upon authority of Sheppard v. Nienow, 254 S.C. 44, 173 S.E.2d 343 (1970), the order of the lower court is

Reversed.

MOSS, C.J., and LEWIS, BUSSEY and BRAILSFORD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shaw v. Still

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 17, 1972
192 S.E.2d 206 (S.C. 1972)
Case details for

Shaw v. Still

Case Details

Full title:Sarah SHAW, Respondent, v. George STILL et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 17, 1972

Citations

192 S.E.2d 206 (S.C. 1972)
192 S.E.2d 206

Citing Cases

Seebaldt v. First Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n

William D. Richardson, of Greenville, for Appellant, cites: As to the complaint alleging facts sufficient to…

Bd. of Comm'rs of Lowndes Cnty. v. Mayor & Council of Valdosta

a suit is brought against an officer or agency of the State with relation to some matter in which the…