From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. Prison

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 17, 2009
Civil No. 09-2456 (PAM/RLE) (D. Minn. Dec. 17, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-2456 (PAM/RLE).

December 17, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson dated November 17, 2009. The R R recommends that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudice as untimely. Petitioner did not file any objections to the R R in the time period permitted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 8) is ADOPTED;
2. The Petition (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice;
3. The Application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is DENIED as moot; and
4. The Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 7) is DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Shaw v. Prison

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 17, 2009
Civil No. 09-2456 (PAM/RLE) (D. Minn. Dec. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Shaw v. Prison

Case Details

Full title:Rajni Nattle Shaw, Petitioner, v. Stillwater Prison, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Dec 17, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 09-2456 (PAM/RLE) (D. Minn. Dec. 17, 2009)

Citing Cases

Nunn v. Hammer

Nunn is also incorrect in his assertion that filing a petition for collateral review somehow "re-starts" the…