From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. Parris

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jun 24, 2022
3:18-CV-155-TAV-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

3:18-CV-155-TAV-DCP

06-24-2022

SAMUEL SHAW, JR., Plaintiff, v. MIKE PARRIS, STANTON HIEDLE, TOMMY JEFFERS, M. MONKHOUSE, and STEVE CANTRELL, Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

THOMAS A. VARLAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order, Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. 103] is GRANTED, Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. 107] is DENIED as moot, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

Because the Court CERTIFIED in its Memorandum Opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, Plaintiff is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis on any subsequent appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shaw v. Parris

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jun 24, 2022
3:18-CV-155-TAV-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Shaw v. Parris

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL SHAW, JR., Plaintiff, v. MIKE PARRIS, STANTON HIEDLE, TOMMY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

Citations

3:18-CV-155-TAV-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 24, 2022)