From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shatner v. Atchison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Oct 27, 2015
Case No. 13-cv-704-JPG-PMF (S.D. Ill. Oct. 27, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-704-JPG-PMF

10-27-2015

DARRIN W. SHATNER, Plaintiff, v. MIKE ATCHISON, HARRINGTON, S. NWAOBASI and TIMOTHY VEATH Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Darrin W. Shatner's motion to withdraw his claims against defendant Timothy Veach (Doc. 79). The Court construes the filing as a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Rule 41(a)(2) provides that only the Court may dismiss an action after an adverse party has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment and in the absence of a stipulation of dismissal of an entire case signed by all the parties. The Court has received no objection to the motion. Accordingly, the Court:

• GRANTS the motion (Doc. 79);

• DISMISSES without prejudice all claims in this case against defendant Veach; and

• DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 27, 2015

s/ J. Phil Gilbert

J. PHIL GILBERT

DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Shatner v. Atchison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Oct 27, 2015
Case No. 13-cv-704-JPG-PMF (S.D. Ill. Oct. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Shatner v. Atchison

Case Details

Full title:DARRIN W. SHATNER, Plaintiff, v. MIKE ATCHISON, HARRINGTON, S. NWAOBASI…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Oct 27, 2015

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-704-JPG-PMF (S.D. Ill. Oct. 27, 2015)