From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shasgus v. Janssen

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 2, 2009
08-CV-180A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2009)

Opinion

08-CV-180A.

September 2, 2009


ORDER


The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On August 13, 2009, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) with prejudice and that defendants' application for recovery of motion costs and attorneys' fees associated with the motion be denied.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott `s Report and Recommendation, defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute is granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) with prejudice, and defendants' application for recovery of motion costs and attorneys' fees associated with this motion is denied.

The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shasgus v. Janssen

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 2, 2009
08-CV-180A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Shasgus v. Janssen

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE SHASGUS as Guardian of Leslie Ann Shasgus, Plaintiff, v. JANSSEN…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Sep 2, 2009

Citations

08-CV-180A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2009)

Citing Cases

Gonzalez v. Rug Care & Cleaning N.Y.C. Inc.

Id. (citing Shasgus v. Janssen, L.P., No. 08-CV-180A, 2009 WL 2878542 (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 2, 2009)…

Avent v. Platinum Plus Auto Prot.

While a district court also has the inherent power to impose sanctions under its “inherent power ‘to manage…