From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharper Image Corp. v. Hoover Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 24, 2004
Case No. 03-4996 JL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 03-4996 JL

March 24, 2004

E. robert (bob) wallach, Lawyer-Counselor, Law Offices of E. robert (bob) wallach, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff Sharper Image Corporation

Alan L. Barry, Noelle J. Quinn, Bell. Boyd Lloyd LLC, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff Sharper Image Corporation

Jeffrey W. Shopoff, Gregory S. Cavallo, Shopoff Cavallo LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff Sharper Image Corporation

Diane J. Mason, Theresa K. Hankes, Dorsey Whitney LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant Hoover Company

Brian Laurenzo, Angela E. Dralle, Dorsey Whitney LLP, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant Hoover Company


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this action, Sharper Image Corporation and Hoover Company, that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties' claims in the above captioned action be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice. Each party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees for this action

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, by signing above counsel for Plaintiff hereby attests it maintains a file copy of this stipulation bearing Defendant's counsel's signature.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sharper Image Corp. v. Hoover Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 24, 2004
Case No. 03-4996 JL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2004)
Case details for

Sharper Image Corp. v. Hoover Co.

Case Details

Full title:SHARPER IMAGE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. HOOVER…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 24, 2004

Citations

Case No. 03-4996 JL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2004)