From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharpe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 29, 2004
889 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 1D04-1404.

December 29, 2004.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Original Jurisdiction.

David M. Robbins and Susan Z. Cohen, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


For the reasons set out by the State in its response to our order to show cause, we find that the petition for writ of certiorari in this case is procedurally barred and, in any event, would fail on the merits. On the merits, petitioner cannot show that his license suspension was a direct result of his plea in 1991. See State v. Bolware, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D2493, ___ So.2d ___, 2003 WL 22460271 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 31, 2003). Procedurally, petitioner knew within three months after his plea that he would suffer an administrative suspension. His actions show conclusively that he accepted that suspension and sought a hardship license after five years, as then permitted by law. He did not file the present motion to set aside his plea until 2002. This proceeding is thus barred, whether viewed as a motion to set aside a plea under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170( l) or a motion for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

DENIED.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sharpe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 29, 2004
889 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Sharpe v. State

Case Details

Full title:Donald SHARPE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 29, 2004

Citations

889 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)