From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharp v. U.S. Army

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 16, 2008
9:04-CV-1070 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2008)

Opinion

9:04-CV-1070 (LEK/VEB).

January 16, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on November 9, 2007 by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 19). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff Eric A. Sharp, which were filed on January 7, 2008. Objections (Dkt. No. 21).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 19) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sharp v. U.S. Army

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 16, 2008
9:04-CV-1070 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Sharp v. U.S. Army

Case Details

Full title:ERIC A. SHARP, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ARMY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jan 16, 2008

Citations

9:04-CV-1070 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2008)

Citing Cases

Kemp v. People

Moreover, if potential trial witnesses are not called to testify at a post conviction review hearing, the…

Fletcher v. T.C. Outlaw

"The jurisprudence in this area has been largely developed by the United States Court of Appeals for the…