From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shannon v. Tapiz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 4, 2023
2:22-cv-1504 AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1504 AC P

05-04-2023

MICHAEL TYRONE SHANNON, Plaintiff, v. J. TAPIZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed March 16, 2023, the first amended complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 8. Thirty days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to file an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-one days of the service of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning.


Summaries of

Shannon v. Tapiz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 4, 2023
2:22-cv-1504 AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Shannon v. Tapiz

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL TYRONE SHANNON, Plaintiff, v. J. TAPIZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 4, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-1504 AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2023)