From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shannon v. Philwebber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2013
1:12-cv-1692 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)

Opinion

1:12-cv-1692 AWI DLB

04-18-2013

JAMES SHANNON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER PHILWEBBER, in his individual and in hisofficial capacity as POLICE OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF MODESTO; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants.


ORDER VACATING

HEARING DATE OF APRIL

22, 2013, AND TAKING

MATTER UNDER

SUBMISSION

In this action for damages, defendant Officer Phil Webber ("Defendant") has moved to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (the "Motion") of plaintiff James Shannon ("Plaintiff"). The matter was scheduled for oral argument to be held April 22, 2013. The Court has reviewed Defendant's Motion, the Plaintiff's opposition, Defendant's reply, the accompanying documents, and the applicable law, and has determined that the Motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of April 22, 2013, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of April 22, 2013, the Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Shannon v. Philwebber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2013
1:12-cv-1692 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Shannon v. Philwebber

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SHANNON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER PHILWEBBER, in his individual and in…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

1:12-cv-1692 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)