From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shank v. Mo. Nat'l Educ. Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 17, 2015
474 S.W.3d 605 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

WD 78526

11-17-2015

Dr. Mickie Shank and Michael Shank, Appellants, v. Missouri National Education Association, Respondent.

Larry A. Bagsby, St. Charles, MO, Attorney for Appellants. Sally E. Barker and Loretta K. Haggard, St. Louis, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Larry A. Bagsby, St. Charles, MO, Attorney for Appellants.

Sally E. Barker and Loretta K. Haggard, St. Louis, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Joseph M. Ellis, Presiding Judge, and Karen King Mitchell and Gary D. Witt, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Dr. Mickie Shank and her husband, Michael Shank, appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Missouri National Education Association (MoNEA), on the Shanks' claims of defamation (libel), tortious interference with business expectancy, and loss of consortium, based upon a letter drafted by MoNEA and provided to the Mexico School District Board of Education. The circuit court granted MoNEA's motion for summary judgment on the ground that the Shanks could not prove malice in the publication of the letter. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Shank v. Mo. Nat'l Educ. Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 17, 2015
474 S.W.3d 605 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Shank v. Mo. Nat'l Educ. Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:Dr. Mickie Shank and Michael Shank, Appellants, v. Missouri National…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 17, 2015

Citations

474 S.W.3d 605 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)