From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shank v. Horak

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jan 22, 2007
4:06CV3253 (D. Neb. Jan. 22, 2007)

Opinion

4:06CV3253.

January 22, 2007


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Defendant has filed a Motion to Strike and/or Make More Definite and Certain (filing 9) and a Motion to Dismiss Under 12(b)(1) 12(b)(6) (filing 10), neither of which were supported by a brief. Both motions raise issues under the Eleventh Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

NECivR 7.1(a)(1)(A) requires that all motions "raising a substantial issue of law must be supported by a paginated brief filed and served contemporaneously with the motion. The brief shall state concisely the reasons for the motion and cite the authorities relied upon." The court "may treat a party's failure to file a brief as an abandonment of the motion." NECivR 7.1(a)(1)(B). Because Defendant's counsel failed to file briefs in support of Defendant's motions to strike and to dismiss, and because such motions raise substantial issues of law, I shall consider the motions abandoned, and I shall deny the motions pursuant to NECivR 7.1(a)(1).

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Strike and/or Make More Definite and Certain (filing 9) and the Motion to Dismiss Under 12(b)(1) 12(b)(6) (filing 10) filed by Defendant are considered abandoned and are denied for failure to file briefs in support of such motions, contrary to NECivR 7.1(a)(1).


Summaries of

Shank v. Horak

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jan 22, 2007
4:06CV3253 (D. Neb. Jan. 22, 2007)
Case details for

Shank v. Horak

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTA SHANK and BILL SHANK d/b/a CHIEF'S JANITORIAL, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Jan 22, 2007

Citations

4:06CV3253 (D. Neb. Jan. 22, 2007)