From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shanghai v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 5, 2009
350 F. App'x 473 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-1163.

November 5, 2009.

On Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade, No. 05-00439, Richard K. Eaton, Judge.

Ned H. Marshak, Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman Klestadt, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Bruce M. Mitchell. Of counsel were Adam M. Dambrov, and Mark E. Pardo, of Washington, DC.

Stephen C. Tosini, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. On the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Reginald T. Blades, Jr., Assistant Director, and Jane C. Dempsey, Trial Attorney.

R. Alan Luberda, Kelley Drye Warren LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees The American Honey Producers Association of America, et al. With him on the brief were Michael J. Coursey, and John M. Herrmann.

LOURIE, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.


Judgment


This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Shanghai v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 5, 2009
350 F. App'x 473 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Shanghai v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:SHANGHAI ESWELL ENTERPRISE CO., LTD., Jinfu Trading Co., Ltd., and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 5, 2009

Citations

350 F. App'x 473 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

QVD Food Co. v. United States

A determination of whether such expenses should or should not be included in the financial ratio expenses is…